Diferencia entre revisiones de «San Francisco»

De 1918
Saltar a: navegación, buscar
m (Protegió «San Francisco» ([Editar=Solo permitir administradores] (indefinido) [Trasladar=Solo permitir administradores] (indefinido)) [en cascada])
 
Línea 1: Línea 1:
 
'''San Francisco'''. ([[Estados Unidos]]. [[Geografía]].)
 
'''San Francisco'''. ([[Estados Unidos]]. [[Geografía]].)
 +
 +
CHRISTINE M. KREISER en [http://www.historynet.com/1918-spanish-influenza-outbreak-the-enemy-within.htm Historynet.com (27 de octubre de 2006)]:
  
 
The tragedy played out with varying degrees of severity across the country. The city of San Francisco, where the flu hit hardest in late October, mandated that gauze masks be worn in public at all times. The mandate was widely followed, though in reality, masks did little to prevent the spread of flu. They were also uncomfortable and inconvenient, and the public would not tolerate them for long. Even officials showed a less than vigilant attitude when the mayor, a city supervisor, a Superior Court judge, a congressman and a rear admiral were photographed at a prizefight sans their protective masks. And there were those who claimed the act was an unconstitutional attack on personal freedom:If the Board of Health can force people to wear masks, said the San Francisco Chronicle,then it can force them to submit to inoculations, or any experiment or indignity.
 
The tragedy played out with varying degrees of severity across the country. The city of San Francisco, where the flu hit hardest in late October, mandated that gauze masks be worn in public at all times. The mandate was widely followed, though in reality, masks did little to prevent the spread of flu. They were also uncomfortable and inconvenient, and the public would not tolerate them for long. Even officials showed a less than vigilant attitude when the mayor, a city supervisor, a Superior Court judge, a congressman and a rear admiral were photographed at a prizefight sans their protective masks. And there were those who claimed the act was an unconstitutional attack on personal freedom:If the Board of Health can force people to wear masks, said the San Francisco Chronicle,then it can force them to submit to inoculations, or any experiment or indignity.
  
 
([[Estados Unidos]]. [[Geografía]].)
 
([[Estados Unidos]]. [[Geografía]].)

Revisión actual del 09:06 20 oct 2016

San Francisco. (Estados Unidos. Geografía.)

CHRISTINE M. KREISER en Historynet.com (27 de octubre de 2006):

The tragedy played out with varying degrees of severity across the country. The city of San Francisco, where the flu hit hardest in late October, mandated that gauze masks be worn in public at all times. The mandate was widely followed, though in reality, masks did little to prevent the spread of flu. They were also uncomfortable and inconvenient, and the public would not tolerate them for long. Even officials showed a less than vigilant attitude when the mayor, a city supervisor, a Superior Court judge, a congressman and a rear admiral were photographed at a prizefight sans their protective masks. And there were those who claimed the act was an unconstitutional attack on personal freedom:If the Board of Health can force people to wear masks, said the San Francisco Chronicle,then it can force them to submit to inoculations, or any experiment or indignity.

(Estados Unidos. Geografía.)